Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to consider Portable-AOT cases during code patching #13323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2021

Conversation

zl-wang
Copy link
Contributor

@zl-wang zl-wang commented Aug 13, 2021

Portable-AOT makes some code sequences different from the
expectation of the current CPU type. When that sequence is
patched, different possible scenarios have to be considered.
Otherwise, doing only according to the current CPU type may
run into crashes.

Signed-off-by: Julian zlwang@ca.ibm.com

Portable-AOT makes some code sequences different from the
expectation of the current CPU type. When that sequence is
patched,  different possible scenarios have to be considered.
Otherwise, doing only according to the current CPU type may
run into crashes.

Signed-off-by: Julian <zlwang@ca.ibm.com>
Copy link
Member

@ymanton ymanton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@ymanton
Copy link
Member

ymanton commented Aug 16, 2021

Jenkins test sanity.functional plinux,aix jdk11

@ymanton
Copy link
Member

ymanton commented Aug 17, 2021

Jenkins test sanity.functional plinux,aix jdk17

@ymanton
Copy link
Member

ymanton commented Aug 18, 2021

@pshipton @tajila This is a fix for Power10. The problem is related to portable AOT and shows up very quickly when running in containers (where portable AOT is enabled by default). Can we consider it for 0.28?

@mstoodle
Copy link
Contributor

Given the important nature of this fix, I think this change should be merged so it can be picked up when we split 0.28 next week. Please proceed with the merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants