Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove setting of Vector Supports in Linkage #15546

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2022

Conversation

r30shah
Copy link
Contributor

@r30shah r30shah commented Jul 14, 2022

Previously support of vector registers were checked while creating a
private linkage, which would not be a good place to do so. It should be
set while initializing Code Generator Object. This PR removes that part
of code from OpenJ9.

Signed-off-by: Rahil Shah rahil@ca.ibm.com

@r30shah r30shah changed the title Remove setting of Vector Supports in Linkage WIP: Remove setting of Vector Supports in Linkage Jul 14, 2022
Previously support of vector registers were checked while creating a
private linkage, which would not be a good place to do so. It should be
set while initializing Code Generator Object. This PR removes that part
of code from OpenJ9.

Signed-off-by: Rahil Shah <rahil@ca.ibm.com>
@r30shah r30shah changed the title WIP: Remove setting of Vector Supports in Linkage Remove setting of Vector Supports in Linkage Jul 19, 2022
@r30shah
Copy link
Contributor Author

r30shah commented Jul 20, 2022

@joransiu Once we get changes in eclipse/omr#6606 merged, we can clean-up the code that sets up things in Linkage through this PR. Can I please get your review on this one? Build ids I posted in eclipse/omr#6606 (comment) tests out this changes as well.

@joransiu
Copy link
Member

jenkins test sanity zlinux jdk11,jdk17 depends eclipse/omr#6606

@joransiu joransiu merged commit 9b8f3c6 into eclipse-openj9:master Jul 22, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants