Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add Code Generation to table of contents #421

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2023

Conversation

AndreasPB
Copy link
Contributor

I noticed it was missing

@edgedb-cla
Copy link

edgedb-cla bot commented Mar 11, 2023

All commit authors signed the Contributor License Agreement.
CLA signed

@AndreasPB
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do I need to do something? Sorry, it's my first time contributing to EdgeDB

@raddevon
Copy link
Contributor

Do I need to do something? Sorry, it's my first time contributing to EdgeDB

No, looks like you're good, @AndreasPB! I just couldn't merge right after approving because I had to wait for the tests to run. Thank you for contributing this!

@raddevon raddevon merged commit 67f39f4 into edgedb:master Mar 14, 2023
fantix added a commit that referenced this pull request May 26, 2023
Changes
=======

* Update for rules of instance names (#423)
  (by @fantix in 5bc5699 for #420)

* Synchronize error types (#429)
  (by @fantix in 03e4012)

* Allow enums in array codec (#431)
  (by @fantix in 2de7e3f for #408)

* Prohibit concurrent operations on the same transaction object (#430)
  (by @fantix in f1fa612 for #130)

* Fix state of transaction start (#424)
  (by @fantix in 297de72)

* codegen: Handle non-identifier characters in enum values (#432)
  (by @fantix in e1ec16d for #428)

Docs
====

* docs: add Code Generation to table of contents (#421)
  (by @AndreasPB in ffe74a1 for #421)
@fantix fantix mentioned this pull request May 26, 2023
@aljazerzen aljazerzen mentioned this pull request Feb 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants