You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The .> is perfectly equivalent to . in paths in all cases. This makes it redundant. The original reasons for keeping it boil down to symmetry with .< and nothing else. In practice, it doesn't appear all that useful or helpful, but it can create a little user confusion (e.g. "is there a difference between this and .?")
In the final balance of things it appears that this syntax should be dropped.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The
.>
is perfectly equivalent to.
in paths in all cases. This makes it redundant. The original reasons for keeping it boil down to symmetry with.<
and nothing else. In practice, it doesn't appear all that useful or helpful, but it can create a little user confusion (e.g. "is there a difference between this and.
?")In the final balance of things it appears that this syntax should be dropped.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: