Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Also check wellformedness of effects in namer #381

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 28, 2024
Merged

Conversation

b-studios
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #281 and also fixes #352 by inserting a single wellformedness check.

@b-studios b-studios merged commit 536c0da into master Jan 28, 2024
1 check passed
@b-studios b-studios deleted the fix/issue281 branch January 28, 2024 12:06
@b-studios
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This resulted in a CI failure on master:

java.lang.AssertionError: assertion failed: Cannot add signature for interface twice: Exception
    at effekt.lifted.mono.FlowAnalysis.addInterface(Analyzer.scala:38)
    at effekt.lifted.mono.Analyzer$package$.analyze(Analyzer.scala:341)
    at effekt.lifted.mono.Analyzer$package$.analyze$$anonfun$1(Analyzer.scala:93)

Is this yet another flaky CI?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Misleading error message when using parametric effects Handling of type parameters for effects
1 participant