Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added data.testCase.version to EiffelTestCaseStartedEvent #126

Merged

Conversation

e-backmark-ericsson
Copy link
Member

As per issue #119

#### data.testCase.uri
__Type:__ String
__Required:__ No
__Description:__ A location where a description of the test case can be retrieved.
__Description:__ A location where a description of the test case can be retrieved. Whether the uri includes the version of the test case or just its id is up to the user of the protocol to decide.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't agree with this. We should state that the actual test case executed SHALL be uniquely and unambiguously identifiable, e.g. "To the extent that multiple versions of the same test case co-exist, the URI SHALL identify the exact version executed."

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. Fair enough.

#### data.testCase.version
__Type:__ String
__Required:__ No
__Description:__ The unique version of the executed test case identity.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps append that "Where this property is not used it is assumed that test cases are not version controlled."

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@d-stahl-ericsson d-stahl-ericsson merged commit 39b2736 into eiffel-community:master Mar 22, 2017
@magnusbaeck magnusbaeck added the protocol All protocol changes label Nov 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
protocol All protocol changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants