Make an effort to use unique transaction IDs.

[xurizaemon]

Refs #26

[eileenmcnaughton]

My current thinking around this is that I will add (at some point) a civicrm_payment table via this extension & track all payments that way & hold a field within that table to represent the value passed to the payment processor. At that point the return value can be more flexible & I expect to use some sort of template

[xurizaemon]

Sounds like a good plan. But not Smarty for the template, ok? :D

I believe we identified a core processor affected by the same - in 🚌 currently so can't check - which makes me wonder if there fix needs to go there instead of in an extension?

[eileenmcnaughton]

I seek to conquer all & replace core processors :-)

Your request for smarty is noted...

[eileenmcnaughton]

Closing this - I want to go down the path of pre-fixing & if really necessary templating rather than randomising