Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add traversalUnion to Control.Lens.Unsound #778

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Apr 29, 2019
Merged

Conversation

Gurkenglas
Copy link
Contributor

@Gurkenglas Gurkenglas commented Dec 17, 2017

From my position, "Traversing the same entry twice is not lawful." is hearsay: Ctrl-F no duplicates on https://artyom.me/lens-over-tea-2

This implementation looks to me like an inefficient proof of concept.

From my position, "Traversing the same entry twice is not lawful." is hearsay: Ctrl-F 'no duplicates' on https://artyom.me/lens-over-tea-2

This implementation looks to me like an inefficient proof of concept.
ekmett's word is law around these parts :P
@ekmett ekmett merged commit b566096 into ekmett:master Apr 29, 2019
@ekmett
Copy link
Owner

ekmett commented Apr 29, 2019

Not keen on the name and may change it, but the functionality is definitely worth adding.

RyanGlScott added a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2019
Mention #778, #796, and #807. Move the CHANGELOG entry for #843 to
the section for the next release.

[ci skip]
RyanGlScott added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2019
Per edwardk's suggestion:

```
07:10:19 <RyanGlScott> Unrelated question: do you have an opinion on what the name of `traversalUnion` should be? #778
You expressed a tentative desire to rename this, so I'd hate to release `lens-4.18` without coming to a conclusion on this
07:11:40 <edwardk> i usually like to stick to one word names in lens, lets see
07:12:50 <edwardk> adjoin or abut? i guess adjoin
07:13:24 <RyanGlScott> Sounds good to me
07:13:29 <edwardk> abut is too short for something janky =)
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants