Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC to make SimplifyTopology() steps optional #603

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 14, 2023

Conversation

ramcdona
Copy link
Contributor

This is not intended for real inclusion.

Each major step in SimplifyTopology() was made separately optional. While this is handy for debugging, it is unlikely the way to production. In particular, some of the steps may depend on one another in ways that this can violate.

However, this gives a base for testing the optionality of steps in SimplifyTopology() and it provides a starting point for the discussion of how these options should be implemented in production.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (bb6acf1) 91.41% compared to head (27879d3) 91.41%.
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #603   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.41%   91.41%           
=======================================
  Files          35       35           
  Lines        4496     4497    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         4110     4111    +1     
  Misses        386      386           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Owner

@elalish elalish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Let's simplify.

std::cout << "found " << numFlagged << " duplicate edges to split"
<< std::endl;
}
if (ManifoldParams().verbose && numFlagged > 0) {
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check your clang-format

for (int i = 0; i < nbEdges; ++i) {
if (halfedge_[i].IsForward()) {
entries.push_back({halfedge_[i].startVert, halfedge_[i].endVert, i});
}
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

splitPinchedVerts and splitDuplicateEdges are not optional - they rarely make a change, but when they do, it's necessary for manifoldness.

Let's just put an early return after this section when ManifoldParams().cleanupTriangles = false and have that be the only new param.

@ramcdona
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this should match what you're thinking.

I force pushed over the earlier revision. That way, this is two simple changes from mainline rather than a ton of noise which is then immediately reverted.

Copy link
Owner

@elalish elalish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@elalish elalish merged commit 1a91d8d into elalish:master Nov 14, 2023
18 checks passed
@elalish elalish mentioned this pull request Nov 17, 2023
cartesian-theatrics pushed a commit to SovereignShop/manifold that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
Add option to skip cleaning up triangles in SimplifyTopology()
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants