-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Model change: transaction.id -> transaction.transaction_id #291
Comments
Why not going with
Ignoring the change in implementation this would require, I think it would be what the user expects. |
Nice idea. Let's do that. |
jalvz
pushed a commit
to jalvz/apm-server
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2017
jalvz
pushed a commit
to jalvz/apm-server
that referenced
this issue
Nov 23, 2017
roncohen
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 24, 2017
Fixed in #345 |
Created new issue to track this: #357 |
simitt
pushed a commit
to simitt/apm-server
that referenced
this issue
Dec 4, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
@gingerwizard pointed out that it would be nice to have the field
transaction_id
always be calledtransaction_id
across our output model. Today we havetransaction.id
andtrace.transaction_id
. Let's change it so it'stransaction.transaction_id
instead.This make it easier to filter for a specific transaction for example in a dashboard and show the transaction, all the traces etc. with a single filter
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: