Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate filebeat.config_dir config option #3429

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ruflin
Copy link
Member

@ruflin ruflin commented Jan 20, 2017

The plan is replace this with a better implementation in the future similar to prospector reloading. See #3362.

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Jan 22, 2017

Is it really helpful to deprecate it without an alternative?

@ruflin
Copy link
Member Author

ruflin commented Jan 23, 2017

We should definitively deprecate it in 5.3 to make sure we can remove / change it in 6.0. Deprecating does not necessarily mean we will remove it. I would also not remove it before we have a replacement. Here is a follow up Github issue to discuss the new configs: #3430

@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ https://github.com/elastic/beats/compare/v5.1.1...master[Check the HEAD diff]
- Fix error on importing dashboards due to colons in the Caassandra dashboard. {issue}3140[3140]

*Filebeat*
- Config option `filebeat.config_dir` is deprecated. It is planned to replace it with a new implementation.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest: "Config option filebeat.config_dir is deprecated. It will be replaced in version 6.0 with a new implementation that also supports configuration reloading"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM. I'm confident enough in #3430 to get it in for 6.0

The plan is replace this with a better implementation in the future similar to prospector reloading. See elastic#3362.
@monicasarbu
Copy link
Contributor

@ruflin Can you please update this PR? Thanks!

@ruflin
Copy link
Member Author

ruflin commented Apr 19, 2017

@tsg @monicasarbu I suggest to open this PR against 5.x to deprecate it there. And for master a PR is needed that does remove the old implementation and switches it over the new reload configuration.

@ruflin ruflin closed this Apr 19, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants