Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AWS] Collect metrics from linked accounts #35540
[AWS] Collect metrics from linked accounts #35540
Changes from all commits
e02cffc
6491654
cc72bbc
2018920
ec5662e
3373931
20fb82f
56d567d
34586ee
6640de8
57da06b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
under what circumstances is this empty when we pass
includeLinkedAccounts
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit, not required for this PR
We should rename
constructMetricQueries
andcreateMetricDataQuery
with something clearer (e.g createQueries vs createSingleQuery)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit not related to this PR - it would be better if we could avoid the manual work of keeping this label in sync with the index constants used to parse it. one way would just be to wrap the label creation and parsing in a type; at least that way the indexing concerns don't bleed out into the code. let's not change it now, just a thought though.