Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make http fields in HAProxy optional to improve compatibility with 1.5 #3788

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 23, 2017

Conversation

ruflin
Copy link
Member

@ruflin ruflin commented Mar 22, 2017

It seems the http fields do not always exists in HAProxy 1.5. We currently only support 1.6 but as this will not break things, I made the fields optional for better compatibility.

It seems the http fields do not always exists in HAProxy 1.5. We currently only support 1.6 but as this will not break things, I made the fields optional for better compatibility.
@ruflin ruflin added Metricbeat Metricbeat needs_backport PR is waiting to be backported to other branches. review labels Mar 22, 2017
@exekias
Copy link
Contributor

exekias commented Mar 22, 2017

LGTM, I launched a manual test that passed, is there any quick cheat to test it again for the PR?

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Mar 22, 2017

jenkins, test it

@tsg
Copy link
Contributor

tsg commented Mar 22, 2017

@exekias ^^- like that

@exekias
Copy link
Contributor

exekias commented Mar 22, 2017

ready to go, can you add a CHANGELOG entry?

@ruflin
Copy link
Member Author

ruflin commented Mar 23, 2017

@exekias I didn't add a Changelog on purpose as I don't see this as a bug fixes as it is an improvement for a non supported version. If we add a changelog under "Added" I worry that we give the impression that we support 1.5. So I tried to keep this under the radar ;-)

@exekias exekias merged commit 66e8edc into elastic:master Mar 23, 2017
@ruflin ruflin deleted the improve-mb-compatiblity-haproxy-15 branch March 27, 2017 09:57
@monicasarbu monicasarbu removed the needs_backport PR is waiting to be backported to other branches. label Mar 29, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants