HLRC: Fix strict setting exception handling #38112
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The LLRC's exception handling for strict mode was previously throwing an exception the HLRC assumed was an error response. This is not the case if the result is valid in strict mode, as it will return the proper response wrapped in an exception with warnings. This commit fixes the HLRC such that it no longer spews if it encounters a strict LLRC response. Closes elastic#37090 Relates elastic#37247
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-features |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The LLRC's exception handling for strict mode was previously throwing an
exception the HLRC assumed was an error response. This is not the case
if the result is valid in strict mode, as it will return the proper
response wrapped in an exception with warnings. This commit fixes the
HLRC such that it no longer spews if it encounters a strict LLRC
response.
Closes #37090
Relates #37247