Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mute RecoveryWithConcurrentIndexing test #40733

Merged

Conversation

dliappis
Copy link
Contributor

@dliappis dliappis commented Apr 2, 2019

Relates #40731

@dliappis dliappis added :Distributed/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. >test-mute Use for PR that only mute tests labels Apr 2, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-distributed

@dliappis dliappis merged commit eb8a591 into elastic:master Apr 2, 2019
@dliappis dliappis deleted the mute-recovery-with-concurrent-indexing branch April 2, 2019 13:19
dliappis added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2019
@dliappis dliappis added the v8.0.0 label Apr 2, 2019
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2019
* master:
  add reason to DataFrameTransformState and add hlrc protocol tests (elastic#40736)
  Remove timezone validation on rollup range queries (elastic#40647)
  Fix testRunStateChangePolicyWithAsyncActionNextStep race condition (elastic#40707)
  Don't mark shard as refreshPending on stats fetching (elastic#40458)
  Name Snapshot Data Blobs by UUID (elastic#40652)
  SQL: [TEST] Mute TIME related failing tests
  [TEST] RecoveryWithConcurrentIndexing test (elastic#40733)
gurkankaymak pushed a commit to gurkankaymak/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 27, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed/Recovery Anything around constructing a new shard, either from a local or a remote source. >test-mute Use for PR that only mute tests v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants