-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[DOC+] ILM min_age interpretation #98245
Conversation
👋 hiya, team! From the time y'all helped me write this [ILM Troubleshooting blog](https://www.elastic.co/blog/troubleshooting-elasticsearch-ilm-common-issues-and-fixes) in 2021 and we later ported errors to [this doc](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/index-lifecycle-error-handling.html) via #75849, the remaining top-gotcha user's raise is "Common issue 3" that ILM's `min_age` calculates off rollover time fallback index creation time. This PR cross-pollinates the blog quote into the docs so that Support can link it to users and so it becomes Google-able. > Common issue 3: min_age calculation clarification > When working with customers, I have seen confusion about how min_age works. The min_age must increase between subsequent phases. If rollover is used, min_age is calculated off the rollover date. This is because rollover generates a new index and the new index’s creation date is used in the calculation. Otherwise, min_age is calculated off the original index’s creation date.
Documentation preview: |
@stefnestor please enable the option "Allow edits and access to secrets by maintainers" on your PR. For more information, see the documentation. |
Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs) |
Pinging @elastic/es-data-management (Team:Data Management) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've left some formatting/wording suggestions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks @stefnestor !
👋 @abdonpijpelink I see this is live in master but not 8.9 nor current, will you kindly help me backport/fix? |
I think it's after @abdonpijpelink's working hours. I'll work on backporting this. I think the |
💚 All backports created successfully
Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
Co-authored-by: Abdon Pijpelink <abdon.pijpelink@elastic.co> Co-authored-by: Stef Nestor <26751266+stefnestor@users.noreply.github.com> fixes) in 2021 and we later ported errors to [this doc](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/index-lifecycle-error-handling.html) via #75849, the remaining top-gotcha user's raise is "Common issue 3" that ILM's `min_age` calculates off rollover time fallback index creation time.
@stefnestor This is live on 8.9 and current now: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/8.9/index-lifecycle-error-handling.html#_common_ilm_setting_issues |
👋 hiya, team!
From the time y'all helped me write this ILM Troubleshooting blog in 2021 and @jrodewig later helped me port errors to this doc via #75849, the remaining top-gotcha user's are still encountering in EO2023 is "Common issue 3" that ILM's
min_age
calculates off rollover time fallback index creation time. (Users consistently expect this to only calculate from creation time.)This PR cross-pollinates the blog quote into the docs so that Support can link it to users and so it becomes Google-able.