Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.9] [DOC+] ILM min_age interpretation (#98245) #98853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023
Merged

[8.9] [DOC+] ILM min_age interpretation (#98245) #98853

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 24, 2023

Conversation

jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from main to 8.9:

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

* [DOC+] ILM min_age interpretation

👋 hiya, team!

From the time y'all helped me write this [ILM Troubleshooting blog](https://www.elastic.co/blog/troubleshooting-elasticsearch-ilm-common-issues-and-fixes) in 2021 and we later ported errors to [this doc](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/index-lifecycle-error-handling.html) via #75849, the remaining top-gotcha user's raise is "Common issue 3" that ILM's `min_age` calculates off rollover time fallback index creation time.

This PR cross-pollinates the blog quote into the docs so that Support can link it to users and so it becomes Google-able.

> Common issue 3: min_age calculation clarification
> When working with customers, I have seen confusion about how min_age works. The min_age must increase between subsequent phases. If rollover is used, min_age is calculated off the rollover date. This is because rollover generates a new index and the new index’s creation date is used in the calculation. Otherwise, min_age is calculated off the original index’s creation date.

* Apply suggestions from code review

---------

Co-authored-by: Abdon Pijpelink <abdon.pijpelink@elastic.co>
(cherry picked from commit 93d36db)
@github-actions
Copy link

Documentation preview:

@jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticsearchmachine test this please

@jrodewig jrodewig merged commit 415ff6a into elastic:8.9 Aug 24, 2023
3 checks passed
@jrodewig jrodewig deleted the backport/8.9/pr-98245 branch August 24, 2023 18:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants