Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

checkpoint: fix handling of R81 fields #3800

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 26, 2022
Merged

Conversation

efd6
Copy link
Contributor

@efd6 efd6 commented Jul 22, 2022

What does this PR do?

Fixes handling of numeric and duplicated fields and removes undocumented fields that appear to be new in R81.

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Screenshots

@efd6 efd6 added bug Something isn't working, use only for issues Team:Security-External Integrations Integration:checkpoint Check Point labels Jul 22, 2022
@efd6 efd6 self-assigned this Jul 22, 2022
@efd6 efd6 marked this pull request as ready for review July 22, 2022 02:26
@efd6 efd6 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2022 02:26
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/security-external-integrations (Team:Security-External Integrations)

@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Jul 22, 2022

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2022-07-22T02:26:20.190+0000

  • Duration: 19 min 38 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 12
Skipped 0
Total 12

🤖 GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

@elasticmachine
Copy link

🌐 Coverage report

Name Metrics % (covered/total) Diff
Packages 100.0% (1/1) 💚
Files 100.0% (1/1) 💚 2.947
Classes 100.0% (1/1) 💚 2.947
Methods 100.0% (15/15) 💚 10.764
Lines 83.333% (685/822) 👎 -7.242
Conditionals 100.0% (0/0) 💚

Copy link
Contributor

@r00tu53r r00tu53r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Comment on lines +474 to 480
- convert:
field: checkpoint.bytes
type: long
ignore_missing: true
- rename:
field: checkpoint.bytes
target_field: network.bytes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thinking of doing this in a single step -

Suggested change
- convert:
field: checkpoint.bytes
type: long
ignore_missing: true
- rename:
field: checkpoint.bytes
target_field: network.bytes
- convert:
field: checkpoint.bytes
target_field: network.bytes
type: long
ignore_missing: true

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That leaves the value in checkpoint.bytes.

Comment on lines +515 to 521
- convert:
field: checkpoint.packets
type: long
ignore_missing: true
- rename:
field: checkpoint.packets
target_field: network.packets
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thinking of doing this in a single step -

Suggested change
- convert:
field: checkpoint.packets
type: long
ignore_missing: true
- rename:
field: checkpoint.packets
target_field: network.packets
- convert:
field: checkpoint.packets
type: long
target_field: network.packets
ignore_missing: true

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

as above

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working, use only for issues Integration:checkpoint Check Point
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants