Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Failing test: X-Pack Detection Engine API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/exception_operators_data_types/text·ts - detection engine api security and spaces enabled Detection exceptions data types and operators Rule exception operators for data type text "is not" operator should filter all words using a common piece of text #115310

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue Oct 17, 2021 · 9 comments
Closed

Failing test: X-Pack Detection Engine API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/exception_operators_data_types/text·ts - detection engine api security and spaces enabled Detection exceptions data types and operators Rule exception operators for data type text "is not" operator should filter all words using a common piece of text #115310

kibanamachine opened this issue Oct 17, 2021 · 9 comments
Assignees
@FrankHassanabad
Labels
blocker failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test skipped-test Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.0.0

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Oct 17, 2021 •
edited
Loading

A test failed on a tracked branch

Error: expected [] to sort of equal [ 'word four', 'word one', 'word three', 'word two' ]
    at Assertion.assert (/opt/local-ssd/buildkite/builds/kb-cigroup-6-15b2c6e3821a96f1/elastic/kibana-hourly/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:100:11)
    at Assertion.eql (/opt/local-ssd/buildkite/builds/kb-cigroup-6-15b2c6e3821a96f1/elastic/kibana-hourly/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:244:8)
    at Context.<anonymous> (test/detection_engine_api_integration/security_and_spaces/tests/exception_operators_data_types/text.ts:348:25)
    at runMicrotasks (<anonymous>)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:96:5)
    at Object.apply (/opt/local-ssd/buildkite/builds/kb-cigroup-6-15b2c6e3821a96f1/elastic/kibana-hourly/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/test/target_node/functional_test_runner/lib/mocha/wrap_function.js:87:16) {
  actual: '[]',
  expected: '[\n  "word four"\n  "word one"\n  "word three"\n  "word two"\n]',
  showDiff: true
}

First failure: CI Build - 7.x
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Oct 17, 2021
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Oct 17, 2021
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - master

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - 7.x

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - 7.x

@azasypkin azasypkin added the Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. label Oct 18, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-solution (Team: SecuritySolution)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Oct 18, 2021
mistic added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2021
@mistic
skip flaky suite (#115310)
e93765e
mistic added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2021
@mistic
skip flaky suite (#115310)
0a8d9f6
@mistic
Copy link
Member

mistic commented Oct 18, 2021

This test keeps failing and looks flaky. Skipping for now.

master/8.0: e93765e
7.x/7.16: 0a8d9f6

@MadameSheema MadameSheema added the Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team label Oct 18, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-detections-response (Team:Detections and Resp)

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad mentioned this issue Oct 20, 2021
Merged
1 task
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad self-assigned this Oct 20, 2021
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - 7.x

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - 7.x

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - 7.x

kibanamachine pushed a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2021
@FrankHassanabad @kibanamachine
[Security Solutions] Fixes 11 different flakey FTR/e2e tests and scen…
711c67c 
…arios (elastic#115688)

## Summary

Fixes flakes across tests that have either been skipped or have been a source of flake in the categories of:
* Sorting fixes because Elasticsearch can return hits/arrays back in different orders
* Flat array fixes because Elasticsearch can sometimes return `[]` or `[[]]` in-deterministically in some cases 🤷 , so we just flatten the array out completely and test for `[]` within those tests.
* `waitForSignalsToBePresent` was missing in a test and sometimes we would get an empty array response which would fail CI.

Also I audited other tests for `[[]]` and `waitForSignalsToBePresent` and fixed them where they were present or if the `waitForSignalsToBePresent` count was incorrect. This should give us more stability when the CI is under pressure.

Sorting fixes:
elastic#115554
elastic#115321
elastic#115319
elastic#114581


Flat array fixes:
elastic#89052
elastic#115315
elastic#115308
elastic#115304
elastic#115313
elastic#113418

Missing additional check for "waitForSignalsToBePresent" or incorrect number of signals to wait for fixes:
elastic#115310


### Checklist

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2021
@kibanamachine @FrankHassanabad
[Security Solutions] Fixes 11 different flakey FTR/e2e tests and scen…
cd613d3 
…arios (#115688) (#115699)

## Summary

Fixes flakes across tests that have either been skipped or have been a source of flake in the categories of:
* Sorting fixes because Elasticsearch can return hits/arrays back in different orders
* Flat array fixes because Elasticsearch can sometimes return `[]` or `[[]]` in-deterministically in some cases 🤷 , so we just flatten the array out completely and test for `[]` within those tests.
* `waitForSignalsToBePresent` was missing in a test and sometimes we would get an empty array response which would fail CI.

Also I audited other tests for `[[]]` and `waitForSignalsToBePresent` and fixed them where they were present or if the `waitForSignalsToBePresent` count was incorrect. This should give us more stability when the CI is under pressure.

Sorting fixes:
#115554
#115321
#115319
#114581


Flat array fixes:
#89052
#115315
#115308
#115304
#115313
#113418

Missing additional check for "waitForSignalsToBePresent" or incorrect number of signals to wait for fixes:
#115310


### Checklist

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios

Co-authored-by: Frank Hassanabad <frank.hassanabad@elastic.co>
snide pushed a commit to snide/kibana that referenced this issue Oct 20, 2021
@FrankHassanabad @snide
[Security Solutions] Fixes 11 different flakey FTR/e2e tests and scen…
cd9e90e 
…arios (elastic#115688)

## Summary

Fixes flakes across tests that have either been skipped or have been a source of flake in the categories of:
* Sorting fixes because Elasticsearch can return hits/arrays back in different orders
* Flat array fixes because Elasticsearch can sometimes return `[]` or `[[]]` in-deterministically in some cases 🤷 , so we just flatten the array out completely and test for `[]` within those tests.
* `waitForSignalsToBePresent` was missing in a test and sometimes we would get an empty array response which would fail CI.

Also I audited other tests for `[[]]` and `waitForSignalsToBePresent` and fixed them where they were present or if the `waitForSignalsToBePresent` count was incorrect. This should give us more stability when the CI is under pressure.

Sorting fixes:
elastic#115554
elastic#115321
elastic#115319
elastic#114581


Flat array fixes:
elastic#89052
elastic#115315
elastic#115308
elastic#115304
elastic#115313
elastic#113418

Missing additional check for "waitForSignalsToBePresent" or incorrect number of signals to wait for fixes:
elastic#115310


### Checklist

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad

Labels
blocker failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test skipped-test Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team Team: SecuritySolution Security Solutions Team working on SIEM, Endpoint, Timeline, Resolver, etc. v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
6 participants
@FrankHassanabad @azasypkin @mistic @elasticmachine @MadameSheema @kibanamachine