New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Integrate Profiling with APM] Navigate from the transaction details view into the Profiling #159686
[Integrate Profiling with APM] Navigate from the transaction details view into the Profiling #159686
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/apm-ui (Team:APM) |
🤖 GitHub commentsExpand to view the GitHub comments
Just comment with:
|
@cauemarcondes I think there's been some slight degradations on the Investigate links, since they appear massive right now. Can we please reduce the size of the links and changing the style to Here's the changes to the default props to the
|
@formgeist I updated the description with the changes you suggested. Thanks for that. |
…m:cauemarcondes/kibana into profiling-apm-int-service-instances-table
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
APM changes LGTM!
cc @boriskirov |
…nt-service-instances-table
…nt-service-instances-table
…nt-service-instances-table
…nt-service-instances-table
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
limits.yml
…nt-service-instances-table
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM :)
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]Module Count
Public APIs missing comments
Async chunks
Public APIs missing exports
Page load bundle
Unknown metric groupsAPI count
ESLint disabled line counts
Total ESLint disabled count
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added some questions/concerns about dependency introductions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like locators as an abstraction. I don't like how they introduce dependencies between observability apps (what happens if profiling wants to link to APM?).
Should we introduce a pattern for keeping locators in "observability-shared", separated by folders that could still be managed via our standard codeowners?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for raising this up. Let me see what I can move to the observability-shared
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't want to unnecessarily hold this feature up to solve this, so if we need to address this outside of this PR, that's fine. But we should talk about what this pattern should look like. APM already depends on the "infra" plugin and uses its locators (#158365) but the APM -> Infra plugin dependency causes lots of problems for us overall, imo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My biggest worry is that the introduction of this dependency would lead us to start pulling other things in, and making it harder to disconnect that dependency in the future, which is the future I want us to aim for (no deps between obs UI plugins). I have a plan for how we might get around this, stay tuned.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're likely going to want this exact thing in the Hosts UI view (cc: @neptunian) -- I don't want to abstract too early so we can copy/paste at first, but eventually we should consider whether it makes sense to have an ObservabilityContext we all share/use/load. I imagine that would need to live in the observability-shared plugin (similar to my comment about locators).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Caue and I talked a bit about the APM -> Profiling dependency and decided it's not something we should block this PR for, but that we should sync up ASAP and create an issue to see if we can find a way to remove that dependency by leveraging the observability_shared plugin in a couple different ways.
new
badge property on the section componentScreen.Recording.2023-06-14.at.1.06.42.PM.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-06-14.at.1.06.19.PM.mov
flamegraph.mov