Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Uptime] Remove beaker icon, update "help" copy #28018

Conversation

justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor

@justinkambic justinkambic commented Jan 3, 2019

Summary

We're removing the beaker icon from the overall app, since it will not be released as an alpha/experimental feature. We're also updating the copy on the link to the Heartbeat forum.

Resolves #27603

Testing the PR

Ensure the beaker icon is gone and the help text copy says "Heartbeat feedback".

@justinkambic justinkambic added v7.0.0 Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability v6.7.0 labels Jan 3, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/uptime

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

@dedemorton
Copy link
Contributor

@gchaps You should review this. I am not crazy about "feedback" but it's your call. "Uptime feedback" sounds a little confusing, IMO. See my comments in #27603.

@gchaps
Copy link
Contributor

gchaps commented Jan 4, 2019

I understand @dedemorton's concern about the use of the word "feedback." A feedback button does typically pop-up a form for the user to fill out.

The word "Discuss" is commonly used with forums. It covers both the use case of asking a question and providing feedback.

Either of these could work:

Discuss
Discuss on forum

@andrewvc
Copy link
Contributor

andrewvc commented Jan 4, 2019

++ to "Discuss" simply because of horizontal space concerns.

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Discuss is fine by me, will update.

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Copy link
Contributor

@dedemorton dedemorton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

Copy link
Contributor

@andrewvc andrewvc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. We may, in a subsequent PR, want to make the link open in a new tab.

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test this

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andrewvc I added d909b2d and now the link opens in a new tab. Let me know if that looks ok to you and I'll merge.

@justinkambic justinkambic mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2019
31 tasks
@andrewvc
Copy link
Contributor

@justinkambic still LGTM. Great work

@justinkambic justinkambic merged commit 2b69fba into elastic:master Jan 10, 2019
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💔 Build Failed

justinkambic added a commit to justinkambic/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
* Add tooltip to beaker icon. Update help copy.

* Remove beaker icon.

* Change feedback link copy to say "Discuss".

* Add target _blank to help link.
justinkambic added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2019
* Add tooltip to beaker icon. Update help copy.

* Remove beaker icon.

* Change feedback link copy to say "Discuss".

* Add target _blank to help link.
@justinkambic
Copy link
Contributor Author

Backported to:
6.x/6.7.0 fe1706b
#28594

@justinkambic justinkambic deleted the uptime_tooltip-lab-icon-update-discuss-copy branch January 11, 2019 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability v6.7.0 v7.0.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants