You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I run the hot threads API with ?human=true specified, the results are not really human readable, and specifying ?human=false does not seem to change the response.
In previous alpha versions, I believe that we returned a more readable response, as shown in the documentation for the hot threads API. I'm opening this issue in case this change was not intentional.
Version: 5.0.0-alpha4
Operating System: OS X
Config File: NA
Sample Data: NA
Steps to Reproduce:
Call the hot threads API and specify ?human=true. The call returns a response that seems to be in XML format, but (IMHO) isn't really human readable. Setting human=false returns the same document. This makes me wonder if the human parameter is working as expected.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just saw the same thing running this command from the diagnostic. I used the exact syntax that was in the current alpha-4 documentation. Copied it.
/_node/hot_threads?human=true
What I get is unpretty json. It's essentially the same output as if you run it with no options at all.
When I run the hot threads API with
?human=true
specified, the results are not really human readable, and specifying?human=false
does not seem to change the response.In previous alpha versions, I believe that we returned a more readable response, as shown in the documentation for the hot threads API. I'm opening this issue in case this change was not intentional.
Call the hot threads API and specify
?human=true
. The call returns a response that seems to be in XML format, but (IMHO) isn't really human readable. Settinghuman=false
returns the same document. This makes me wonder if thehuman
parameter is working as expected.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: