Unify *.to_iso8601 functions for calendar types #7297
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Fastlane structs already in the ISO calendar * crash with FunctionClauseError on bad format. This should actually improve the error message in dev and test given exception blaming. Previously the "bad format" argument error would be also raised when the function was given not a calendar struct (but, for example an erlang style tuple) - very confusing!
|
❤️ 💚 💙 💛 💜 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FunctionClauseErroron bad format. This should actually improve the error message in dev and test given exception blaming. Previously the "bad format" argument error would be also raised when the function was given not a calendar struct (but, for example an erlang style tuple) - very confusing!