Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update examples/elm.json to be ready for Elm 0.19.1 #42

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tamc
Copy link

@tamc tamc commented Jan 24, 2020

Before it was setup to be ready for Elm 0.19.0 which means
you see an error when trying to run the exmaple in Elm 0.19.1.

Now that Elm 0.19.1 is released it seems, to me at least, to be
a good idea for the examples to run by default on that version,
and for the user to have to modify it to run a different version.

Before it was setup to be ready for Elm 0.19.0 which means
you see an error when trying to run the exmaple in Elm 0.19.1.

Now that Elm 0.19.1 is released it seems, to me at least, to be
a good idea for the examples to run by default on that version,
and for the user to have to modify it to run a different version.
Copy link

@harrysarson harrysarson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a maintainer but the general pr looks good to me. One quick fix with source directories.

@@ -1,25 +1,25 @@
{
"type": "application",
"source-directories": [
"."
"src"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should not have been changed (the elm files are in the root examples directory)

@tamc
Copy link
Author

tamc commented Jan 11, 2023

Closing as I've not done anything on this in more than two years, so I'm unlikely to in the future.

@tamc tamc closed this Jan 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants