-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 122
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for server request and client response #29
Comments
Hello! Can you just run both server and client instances on both sides? That would solve the case. |
Hello! Unfortunately no, as the server can't connect to the client. Basically we can't guarantee, that the client won't be under the firewall protection or even to have an external ip address. |
@ScriptWorker: Ok, I agree and I would gladly merge the feature if no current use cases break! |
@ScriptWorker Any progress here, maybe? |
This will be available in version 5.x. Currently in development. |
Any update on version 5.x? I would like the library to support this feature |
@FMRb Unfortunately, no. Out of resources currently! |
you really ought to make it clear in the ReadMe that this is one-way, browser running procedures on a remote server only, because it's such a huge limitation of this library. |
Will do, thanks!
…On Wed, Apr 10, 2019, 15:48 davidmoshal ***@***.***> wrote:
you really ought to make it clear in the ReadMe that this is one-way,
browser running procedures on a remote server only, because it's such a
huge limitation of this library.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#29 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADV__KjQ6eu1aPPMLQAQzhG9b4sENY_vks5vfeuXgaJpZM4S6JYt>
.
|
@ScriptWorker @davidmoshal @FMRb: This is now available in version 6.0.0-beta.0. |
@FMRb: btw, any initial feedback on this feature, maybe? :) |
Due to positive feedback this will hit master soon. It’s currently released as 6.x in beta due to insufficient migration docs, but that should be available soon. Closing this one. |
My solution is that the client calls the server method, registers a function A, and then the server returns promise. example:
|
We have a case when the server should make requests to the client. At this point this library do not have such functionality, while specification do not restrict regarding this.
Do you interested in merging such PR if we will implement it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: