Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

company backend for library name completion #509

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2018

Conversation

nverno
Copy link
Contributor

@nverno nverno commented Mar 25, 2018

just fixed up from previous pull request

@lionel-
Copy link
Member

lionel- commented Mar 25, 2018

It's alright to force-push on your own pull request rather than open another one ;). This way the PR keeps a reference to the discussions.

@nverno
Copy link
Contributor Author

nverno commented Mar 25, 2018

yea my bad, I don't know git well enough to squash together three commits that are separated by others.
TLDR: the discussions bby @vspinu involved choosing .packages vs. installed.packages which uses its own internal cache, and whether to cache on the lisp side

@vspinu
Copy link
Member

vspinu commented Apr 1, 2018

Ok. Let's go with this. I don't mind adding it by default to the list of backends. Few people who have issues can always disable it.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants