[ENHANCEMENT] Don't make assumptions about dataType and payload.

[abuiles]

Since the final goal of this is to become a service for making AJAX request, it would be a good idea not to make many assumptions about such request, AJAX does not necessarily mean json.

I'd like to propose we just expose the basic interface for jQuery.ajax without trying to be too smart about it. With this we also address issues like #2.

Also what about changing the the args of service.request to be ONLY url and options, I think this provides better ergonomics that the current implementation, for example if I want to do a get with query params I'd have to do something like service.request(url, 'GET', {data: {foo: true}} this could be reduce to service.request(url, {data: {foo: true}} since GET tends to be the default, and then if I need a different request type, then I could just specify that in the options (like $.ajax)

[taras]

Great simple solution. Thank you

[abuiles]

@taras I'll open a second PR for the argument change, notice they are breaking changes.

[taras]

Also what about changing the the args of service.request to be ONLY url and options, I think this provides better ergonomics that the current implementation, for example if I want to do a get with query params I'd have to do something like service.request(url, 'GET', {data: {foo: true}} this could be reduce to service.request(url, {data: {foo: true}} since GET tends to be the default, and then if I need a different request type, then I could just specify that in the options (like $.ajax)

I agree. I think is a good idea. Can we make it backwards compatible?

[devinus]

This would have been great if it then checked for dataType here 63973c3#diff-6ad1f65c87cc1996c63b65a765d84933L131 rather than removing it.