Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] #6617 on top of #6449 #6650

Closed
wants to merge 35 commits into from

Conversation

nathanhammond
Copy link
Contributor

Should demonstrate any failures introduced in #6617.

nathanhammond and others added 5 commits January 6, 2017 17:54
Prior to this change, after retrieving the `addon` trees for all addons
we then immediately concat the assets down into a single `addons.{js,css}`
file (after merging and funneling to a different location).

The long term objective is to keep "loose modules" throughout the entire
pipeline and eventually replace the final concat stages that we are currently
using with a higher level "packager". This takes a very small step towards
that future...

The good news is that this is actually a win regardless of that future state.
@nathanhammond
Copy link
Contributor Author

nathanhammond commented Jan 7, 2017

Output change identified so far:

Before 6617
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/_import.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/alpha.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/app.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/child-addon.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/grandchild-addon.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/_import.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/addon.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/alpha.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/app.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/child-addon.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/zeta.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/_import.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/addon.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/alpha.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/app.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/grandchild-addon.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/zeta.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/zeta.css"; }
After 6617
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/_import.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/alpha.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/app.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/child-addon.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/_import.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/addon.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/alpha.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/app.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/child-addon.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/zeta.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/grandchild-addon.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/_import.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/addon.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/alpha.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/app.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/grandchild-addon.css"; }
.grandchild-addon { content: "addon/styles/zeta.css"; }
.child-addon { content: "addon/styles/zeta.css"; }

The trick is to identify which section came from vendor.css as opposed to being inserted via other methods to understand why it changed.

@homu
Copy link
Contributor

homu commented Jan 11, 2017

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6664) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@nathanhammond nathanhammond deleted the remove-extra-work branch March 28, 2017 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants