Linting and Groups update

[jdunkerley]

Pull Request Description

• Fix issues from the linter.
• Rename the constructors for Blank_Selector.
• Update various GROUP tags.

Checklist

Please ensure that the following checklist has been satisfied before submitting the PR:

• The documentation has been updated, if necessary.
• Screenshots/screencasts have been attached, if there are any visual changes. For interactive or animated visual changes, a screencast is preferred.
• All code follows the
  Scala,
  Java,
  and
  Rust
  style guides. In case you are using a language not listed above, follow the Rust style guide.
• All code has been tested:
  • Unit tests have been written where possible.
  • If GUI codebase was changed, the GUI was tested when built using ./run ide build.

[radeusgd]

Looks good to me.

Personally I'd change a few Metadata groups in XML into Selections, as they seem more natural to me, but maybe there is some other reason for how this is split?

[GregoryTravis]

Why do we not prefix this as Standard.Base.Conversions?

[GregoryTravis]

Is it a scoping thing? It's implied since this is in Standard.Base?

[jdunkerley]

Yes it's implied as in Standard.Base.

[GregoryTravis]

Like what @radeusgd said about XML elements, I wonder if this is something like Selections. Nearly every part of the URI is classified as Metadata here.