Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove GPG secret parameter resolver #295
Remove GPG secret parameter resolver #295
Changes from 3 commits
1e56620
26b636b
b33168b
b1d29d2
30366ac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The stack definition still needs to contain this because the GPG resolver depends on it https://github.com/envato/stack_master-gpg_parameter_resolver/blob/master/lib/stack_master/parameter_resolvers/secret.rb#L43
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The GPG Parameter Resolver actually adds this back in.
This is a rather dubious approach though. Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, I'm preferring to move this into the GPG gem. That way it doesn't need to be supported in StackMaster, we can make a clean break with version 2.
Later we could re-work the GPG Parameter Resolver to not use this configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wholly monkey patching that's ugly.
Ok let's leave it as is and refactor for a v1 of GPG parameter resolver.
This file was deleted.