-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update roadmap for v0.5.0 #1372
Conversation
arkodg
commented
Apr 27, 2023
- Moves Allow users to configure xDS resources #24 into v0.5.0 since it carries over from v0.4.0
- Adds Envoy Gateway performance at scale #1365 since it tracks the work items of the Scale theme
- Removed other items not tied directly to the roadmap theme
- Added a placeholder roadmap theme for v0.6.0
* Moves envoyproxy#24 into v0.5.0 since it carries over from v0.4.0 * Adds envoyproxy#1365 since it tracks the work items of the Scale theme * Removed other items not tied directly to the roadmap theme * Added a placeholder roadmap theme for v0.6.0 Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <arko@tetrate.io>
ptal @envoyproxy/gateway-maintainers , hoping to get a majority approval on the roadmap
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1372 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 62.27% 62.47% +0.20%
==========================================
Files 78 78
Lines 10946 10946
==========================================
+ Hits 6817 6839 +22
+ Misses 3676 3658 -18
+ Partials 453 449 -4 |
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <arko@tetrate.io>
Signed-off-by: Arko Dasgupta <arko@tetrate.io>
Data plane Observability will be fine in v0.5 to me, no bandwidth for control plane. BTW, I think we should start basic e2e tests in v0.5, WDYT? |
thanks for the ACK @zirain . Yes would be good to also start e2e (currently blocked on upstream release) but imo would prioritize data plane observability over it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, I can work on control plane side observation
What e2e test @zirain mentioned for? Do I miss some contexts on it? |
Got it thanks ! @arkodg |