allow snapshots shorter than trunc_max

[sbfnk]

estimate_truncation currently fails when the any snapshot is shorter than trunc_max. This PR fixes that by provding explicit bounds and vector elements in the appropriate place.

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 9493405 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:default: 59.3s -> 57.5s [-25.05%, +18.92%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:no_delays: 59.1s -> 57.4s [-15.7%, +10%]
• ❗🐌random_walk: 15.1s -> 17.2s [+2.13%, +24.56%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:stationary: 32.5s -> 33.2s [-7.96%, +12.27%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:uncertain: 1.22m -> 1.28m [-9.06%, +19.61%]
  Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[seabbs]

All looks good. I would probably phrase this as a new feature vs fixing a bug as the function was never meant to work when snapshots < delays (though this was of course not communicated).

Just needs a dev version bump.

[seabbs]

LGTM

[sbfnk]

I would probably phrase this as a new feature vs fixing a bug

Done in 4bfc01e

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 195a1c4 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:default: 1.07m -> 1.01m [-15.21%, +4.51%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:no_delays: 58.6s -> 57.2s [-13.85%, +8.95%]
•   :rocket:random_walk: 17.9s -> 16.8s [-12.67%, -0.19%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:stationary: 37.3s -> 37.6s [-9.03%, +10.4%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:uncertain: 1.25m -> 1.33m [-12.09%, +24.8%]
  Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[seabbs]

Ruh Roh

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if bce1d56 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:default: 46.1s -> 45.7s [-14.08%, +12.18%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:no_delays: 44.3s -> 45.8s [-8.47%, +15.65%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:random_walk: 14.1s -> 17s [-8.35%, +49.82%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:stationary: 29s -> 28.2s [-14.76%, +9.84%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:uncertain: 1.12m -> 1.07m [-17.08%, +9.19%]
  Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 6e4c9dd is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:default: 48.3s -> 51.8s [-6.29%, +21.1%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:no_delays: 45.3s -> 48.6s [-4.95%, +19.41%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:random_walk: 27.3s -> 14s [-163.96%, +66.79%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:stationary: 28.1s -> 29.1s [-5.38%, +12.95%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:uncertain: 1.07m -> 1.15m [-7.96%, +22.72%]
  Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[github-actions]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if e482384 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:default: 56.6s -> 57s [-14.51%, +16.12%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:no_delays: 57.3s -> 58s [-6.35%, +8.97%]
• ❗🐌random_walk: 16.4s -> 18.7s [+2.89%, +24.78%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:stationary: 36.2s -> 33.2s [-20.01%, +3.29%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:uncertain: 1.38m -> 1.46m [-10.74%, +22.36%]
  Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.