Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

eruption and pipewire #53

Closed
Glog78 opened this issue Mar 13, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

eruption and pipewire #53

Glog78 opened this issue Mar 13, 2021 · 2 comments
Assignees
@X3n0m0rph59
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Glog78
Copy link

Glog78 commented Mar 13, 2021

Describe the bug
Not a bug / feature request

To Reproduce
none

Expected behavior
I would love to use audio viz on distributions with pipewire

Logs
none

As far as i see currently pulseaudio and the root "workaround" is requiered to get the audio setup done. Could you check if it could also work with a local pulse server (localhost:port) which can be provided with pipewire too. Additional config option maybe ? Needs maybe to check periodically if the server is started or something like this since there pipewire daemon in the user context.
@X3n0m0rph59 X3n0m0rph59 self-assigned this Mar 14, 2021
@X3n0m0rph59 X3n0m0rph59 added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 14, 2021
X3n0m0rph59 added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 14, 2021
@X3n0m0rph59
Add documentation
2a58e10 
Update README.md and add SETUP_AUDIO.md (References #53)
Describe how to set up Eruption with PipeWire
Factor out audio related documentation from README.md to its own file
@X3n0m0rph59
Copy link
Member

@Glog78 Thanks for posting this feature request!

I have looked into adding support for PipeWire and added some preliminary documentation on how to set up audio for PipeWire enabled Linux distributions.

I got it working using the PulseAudio interface of PipeWire on ArcoLinux (Arch based) using the packages pipewire-git and pipewire-pulse-git. I only tried the unix domain socket transport, not the IP socket based transport, but I suppose that would work too.

@Glog78
Copy link
Author

Glog78 commented Mar 16, 2021

Thanks alot for the additional information. I think i will update to pipewire-git and pipewire-pulse-git in this case and check over. For me this one can be closed and i will report back once i can check (might take me a little).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@X3n0m0rph59 X3n0m0rph59

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@X3n0m0rph59 @Glog78