Pos sale status #5038
Pos sale status #5038
Conversation
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Type: Enhancement
PR Summary: This pull request introduces the concept of sale status within the POS client API, allowing for orders to be marked with specific sale statuses such as 'CART' or 'CONFIRMED'. It includes updates to GraphQL resolvers, schema definitions, and the addition of a new mutation for changing the sale status of an order. The changes span across multiple files, including mutations, queries, schema definitions, and constants, ensuring that the new sale status functionality is integrated throughout the system.
Decision: Comment
📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
- Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.
General suggestions:
- Consider future-proofing the
getSaleStatusfunction to easily accommodate additional sale statuses as the application evolves. - Ensure consistency in the handling and representation of sale statuses across different parts of the application to maintain code clarity and ease of maintenance.
- Review the naming conventions used for the new constants and functions to ensure they are intuitive and consistent with existing patterns within the project.
packages/plugin-posclient-api/src/graphql/resolvers/mutations/orders.ts: Consider centralizing sale status logic to reduce complexity and improve maintainability.
The recent changes introduce additional complexity, primarily due to the introduction of ORDER_SALE_STATUS and its associated logic spread across multiple parts of the codebase. While the intent to manage sale statuses more granularly is clear, the current approach increases the cognitive load for developers by adding more conditional logic and spreading related logic across various functions.
A potential way to simplify this would be to encapsulate the sale status logic within a smaller number of functions or classes. This could help in centralizing the logic related to sale statuses, making the code easier to maintain and understand. For example, creating a class like OrderStatusManager that handles all sale status updates and validations could reduce the need for scattered logic and checks throughout the codebase.
Here's a simplified example of how this could look:
class OrderStatusManager {
constructor(order) {
this.order = order;
}
updateSaleStatus(newStatus) {
if (this.isValidSaleStatus(newStatus)) {
this.order.saleStatus = newStatus;
this.order.save(); // Assuming a method to persist changes.
}
}
isValidSaleStatus(status) {
return [ORDER_SALE_STATUS.CONFIRMED, ORDER_SALE_STATUS.CART].includes(status);
}
}Usage of such a class would centralize the handling of sale statuses, potentially making the system easier to extend and maintain. This is just a suggestion and might need adjustments to fit into the existing architecture, but the principle of centralizing related logic could be beneficial in managing complexity.
packages/plugin-posclient-api/src/models/definitions/constants.ts: The code change maintains consistency with existing patterns, not increasing complexity and aligning well with the current structure.
After reviewing the changes, it appears that the introduction of ORDER_SALE_STATUS follows the existing pattern used for constants like ORDER_STATUSES and ORDER_ITEM_STATUSES. This consistency in structuring constants is beneficial for maintainability and understanding, as it leverages a familiar pattern for developers working within this codebase. The change does not significantly increase the complexity of the code. It's clear that the approach taken aligns well with the current code structure, ensuring that new and existing developers can easily grasp and work with these constants.
packages/plugin-posclient-api/src/models/definitions/orders.ts: The code change is justified and maintains clarity, introducing necessary complexity for new functionality in a structured manner.
The recent changes introduce a new saleStatus field to both the IOrder interface and the schema, along with importing ORDER_SALE_STATUS from ./constants. While these modifications do increase the code's complexity, it's a justified and necessary addition to support the new functionality of tracking the sale status of an order. Each change is directly related to implementing this feature and follows best practices for extending functionality within a MongoDB/Mongoose context, such as using enums for validation and indexing new fields for performance.
Adding a new field to the interface and schema is a common practice when new features or requirements are introduced, and the way you've handled it—by specifying type, label, enum, default value, and indexing—is clear and maintainable. It's important for new code to remain as understandable and manageable as possible, and your changes adhere to this principle.
As we continue to extend our models and schemas, let's ensure we maintain this level of clarity and purpose in our changes, keeping in mind the balance between necessary complexity for new features and overall code maintainability. Great job on implementing this new feature in a clean and structured way.
Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨
| export const getSaleStatus = (config, doc, order) => { | ||
| if (order.saleStatus) { | ||
| if (order.saleStatus === ORDER_SALE_STATUS.CONFIRMED) { | ||
| return ORDER_SALE_STATUS.CONFIRMED; | ||
| } | ||
| return ORDER_SALE_STATUS.CART; | ||
| } | ||
| return ORDER_SALE_STATUS.CART; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (llm): The getSaleStatus function implementation is straightforward and aligns well with the existing pattern of status determination functions. However, it might be beneficial to consider if there are more states that saleStatus could take in the future and if this function's design will accommodate such changes without significant modifications.
No description provided.