-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: enable @scope/plugin/ruleId
-style specifier (refs #6362)
#6939
Conversation
LGTM |
@mysticatea, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @nzakas, @lo1tuma and @IanVS to be potential reviewers |
} catch (err) { | ||
debug("Failed to load plugin eslint-plugin-" + pluginNameWithoutPrefix + ". Proceeding without it."); | ||
debug("Failed to load plugin " + longName + ". Proceeding without it."); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unrelated to this PR, but I'm not sure "Proceeding without it." makes sense here since we're throwing an exception and killing the CLIEngine process. If you agree, I can make an issue about fixing that debug statement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will fix it additionally in this PR.
Is it OK that I simply remove Proceeding without it.
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm okay with it, but you may want a second opinion. Thanks!
On Aug 19, 2016 9:32 AM, "Toru Nagashima" notifications@github.com wrote:
In lib/config/plugins.js
#6939 (comment):} catch (err) {
debug("Failed to load plugin eslint-plugin-" + pluginNameWithoutPrefix + ". Proceeding without it.");
debug("Failed to load plugin " + longName + ". Proceeding without it.");
I will fix it additionally in this PR.
Is it OK that I simply remove Proceeding without it.?—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/eslint/eslint/pull/6939/files/fe9d2f7e3dd14558c2df35d55dda4691ded1f888#r75491658,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AARWeqzbyDlDnr-QSvxMbISzBGwUW7-Mks5qhb5jgaJpZM4Jogs2
.
LGTM |
Lgtm, just waiting another day so others can review. |
LGTM. @nzakas want to merge? |
Refs #6362.
This PR just adds the support of
@scope/plugin/rule
-style rule specifiers.