grove TB6612FNG

[max246]

Description:

Pull request in esphome with YAML changes (if applicable): esphome/esphome#

Checklist:

• [ x ] I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
  or

• I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

• [ x] Link added in /index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	ba664a9
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/64ae06acf5442500088e8e74
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2906--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[github-actions]

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request recently. This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because of that and will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

[max246]

Need a reviewer :/

[glmnet]

This is not good. Check https://next.esphome.io/#motor-components no table format here?? May be this should go into misc components?

Also the doc file is grove-tb6612fng which looks ok to me as this implements the chip with that name, but the esphome component is grove_i2c_motor. This is just wrong; no other components mismatch like this. Easiest will be to rename the doc file, but I believe naming the component as the chip is much better.

Also same image grove_tb6612fng.jpg is in two folders.

[max246]

This is not good. Check https://next.esphome.io/#motor-components no table format here?? May be this should go into misc components?

Also the doc file is grove-tb6612fng which looks ok to me as this implements the chip with that name, but the esphome component is grove_i2c_motor. This is just wrong; no other components mismatch like this. Easiest will be to rename the doc file, but I believe naming the component as the chip is much better.

Also same image grove_tb6612fng.jpg is in two folders.

I will open a PR to amend the naming in the main core and another one to fix the table in the doc. thank you for pointing it out.