-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enshrine standard vs frontier chains in yaml enum #140
Conversation
and update scripts and instructions accordingly
61ae41d
to
2bc1df6
Compare
…ains Retain existing OPChains (contains the union of Standardchains and FrontierChains)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, just a few nitpicks from me.
- add show_usage() fn - use SUPERCHAIN_LEVEL var
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have reviewed the Go and Yaml changes only, as a go-reviewer.
Looks like we've added a single enum field, and set the chains as
Zora-main: Frontier
PGN-main: Frontier
Orderly-main: Frontier
OP-main: Standard
Mode-main: Standard
Lyra-main: Frontier
Base-main: Standard
Zora-sepolia: Standard
PGN-sepolia: Frontier
OP-sepolia: Standard
Base-sepolia: Standard
OP-dev: Standard
Base-dev: Standard
That makes sense to me!
Closes https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/security-pod/issues/82
I considered and discarded the alternative approach of having an even more deeply nested folder structure here #137.
This is a pretty lightweight way of demarcating the two types of chains, which: