Remove duplicate file

[fulldecent]

This is a duplicate of https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1046

Ping for approval: Tommy Nicholas (@tomasienrbc), Matt Russo (@mateosu), John Zettler (@JohnZettler), Matt Condon (@shrugs)

See #1046 and #1047.

[fulldecent]

@Arachnid approved above, requesting review please

[axic]

While these two files were identical at the time they were merged, now they have diverged a tiny bit. To me it seems that EIP-1046 is the more "maintained" version, and would agree with removing it.

However, this opens the question and precedent: should "invalid" or mistakenly merged EIPs be ever removed or only marked Abandoned/Withdrawn/Superseded?

More feedback from @Souptacular @MicahZoltu @lightclient would be welcome.

[lightclient]

I like the idea of editors having some "editorial power" in matters like this. I would generally agree that once an EIP is published, it should become a permanent fixture. But I also understand that the editors are trying to curate and publish a cohesive set of EIPs, and IMO deleting a duplicate (mistake) EIP is within the bounds of an editor's power.

Given that this EIP is still a draft, and based on it's limited reach (based on a brief few internet searches just now), I don't see an issue with merging this.

[MicahZoltu]

I'm a fan of deleting abandoned EIPs rather than just flagging them as abandoned, but I believe I'm alone with this stance. In this case, I favor deletion but would accept abandoned.

[axic]

Hah, I just noticed these are using reddit as a discussion url, see #2967.

[axic]

@MicahZoltu @lightclient only realised now that the authors actually approved this. If they have I'm on board getting rid of it! It would be a different conversation should the authors not respond.

[MicahZoltu]

With the author's approval, I'm good on deleting this if other editors are (which it sounds like they are).