New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add EIP: Reuse Withdrawn Validator Indices #6914
Conversation
✅ All reviewers have approved. |
Co-authored-by: lightclient <14004106+lightclient@users.noreply.github.com>
EIPS/eip-6914.md
Outdated
title: Reuse Withdrawn Validator Indices | ||
description: Reuse fully withdrawn and safe to reuse validator indices for new beacon chain deposits. | ||
author: Lion (@dapplion), Danny Ryan (@djrtwo) | ||
discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereum/consensus-specs/issues/3335 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't realize that discussions-to MUST be eth magicians. Can we not use an issue on the spec repo? This is where organic conversation aroudn these specs already occurs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main concern is about deletion of the issue, but i guess can be waived for execution-specs
and consensus-specs
issues as those two repos can enforce non deletion
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ | |||
--- | |||
eip: draft_reuse_withdrawn_validator_indi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eip: draft_reuse_withdrawn_validator_indi | |
eip: 6914 |
Assigning EIP number as PR number. Please also update the filename.
I'll just need an author to confirm @g11tech's suggestion and I think this'll be good to merge. |
The commit 60fef4b (as a parent of 2d60b94) contains errors. |
Co-authored-by: g11tech <develop@g11tech.io>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LFG 🚀 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All Reviewers Have Approved; Performing Automatic Merge...
todo: