Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EIP: Separated Payer Transaction #7949

Closed

Conversation

adietrichs
Copy link
Member

Create an EIP for a new separated payer transaction type.

Todo before merge:

  • write rationale

@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core labels Nov 3, 2023
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 3, 2023

File EIPS/eip-XXXX.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @Pandapip1, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review labels Nov 3, 2023
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title New EIP: Separated Payer Transaction Add EIP: Separated Payer Transaction Nov 3, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Nov 3, 2023
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 3, 2023

The commit 127988e (as a parent of 9d4871f) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
---
eip: XXXX
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
eip: XXXX
eip: 7553

Assigning next sequential EIP/ERC/RIP number.
Numbering changed to sequential from 7500 and is no longer the PR number.

Please also update the filename.

@domothyb
Copy link

domothyb commented Mar 8, 2024

I quite like the idea behind this EIP! I believe it could be enhanced significantly if there was an additional EVM opcode that returns the address of the payer, so the sender's call could involve any arbitrary logic, but most commonly sending any token/stablecoin to tx.payer, whoever that happens to be. Or have DEXs integrate tx.payer natively so the user doesn't have to even think about gas fees at all.

EOAs could then broadcast a signed partially filled transaction of this type to the mempool, then it's up to whoever wants to to fill out the rest and sign as the sender and get it included in a block and pay the actual gas fee in ETH

@lightclient
Copy link
Member

@domothyb can you post this on eth mag please? We try to avoid EIP discussion in the PR.

Copy link

There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-stale Waiting on activity label Apr 16, 2024
Copy link

This pull request was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback or request a review in a comment.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core w-ci Waiting on CI to pass w-stale Waiting on activity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants