Add EIP: Block-level Warming #7968
Conversation
…#4) * Add article on the "compression" of access lists by execution clients * Make a compressed access list as a required p2p protocol change * Introduce a 32 gas minimum base fee equivalent for including an entry in ACL (#6) * Set minimum cost of ACL entry to 32 gas; apply also to the Priority Fee
github-actions
bot
added
c-new
File
|
eth-bot
added
e-consensus
eth-bot
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <28278242+abcoathup@users.noreply.github.com>
github-actions
bot
added
w-ci
|
The commit c644cae (as a parent of 14eb98a) contains errors. |
| is more complex.\ | ||
| We propose the following approach to a fair reimbursement of the paid `priorityFee`: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. The validator gets paid the `priorityFee` for each cold access only once, but according to the highest `priorityFee` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| 1. The validator gets paid the `priorityFee` for each cold access only once, but according to the highest `priorityFee` | |
| 1. The builder gets paid the `priorityFee` for each cold access only once, but according to the highest `priorityFee` |
and similar such corrections below
| among the transactions containing the said cold access. | ||
| 2. The rest of the Ether that was charged by the validator as a `priorityFee` is redistributed back to all the senders | ||
| of transactions containing the same cold access in proportion to their **marginal contribution** to the total reimbursement. | ||
| 3. The `marginal contribution` of a transaction to the total reimbursement is defined as the difference between the sum total |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
so the contribution of the the most expensive transaction is the second largest priority fee * gas cost. although this is fine but cost could just be proportionately reimbursed keeping it simple
| In order to minimize the cost of permanently storing access lists, we propose the following changes to | ||
| the `execution_payload` structure: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. Add a new `block_access_list` field. \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
block_access_list also could be a derived thing from the per tx access list
| "accessors": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "sender": "0x90F8bf6A479f320ead074411a4B0e7944Ea8c9C1", | ||
| "priorityFeePerGas": "1000" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
although priorityFeePerGas is important to derive the reimbursements but they are again a picked from the txs, also sender info is not really important at this level. the compressed per tx reference can again resolve this
|
There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review. |
ATTENTION: ERC-RELATED PULL REQUESTS NOW OCCUR IN ETHEREUM/ERCS
--
When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md
We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met: