Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update EIP-152: Fix reference test #8390

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

chfast
Copy link
Contributor

@chfast chfast commented Apr 4, 2024

The solidity example with the reference test of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7693#appendix-A is at least confusing because it declares values of type bytes8 using a literal of length of 4 bytes.

The solidity example with the reference test of https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7693#appendix-A is at least confusing because it declares values of type `bytes8` using a literal of length of 4 bytes.
@chfast chfast requested a review from eth-bot as a code owner April 4, 2024 22:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-update Modifies an existing proposal s-final This EIP is Final t-core labels Apr 4, 2024
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Apr 4, 2024

File EIPS/eip-152.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @MadeofTin, @mhluongo, @pdyraga

@eth-bot eth-bot added the e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus label Apr 4, 2024
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title EIP-152: Fix reference test Update EIP-152: Fix reference test Apr 4, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2024

The commit 8da81ce (as a parent of 026ea35) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Apr 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@SamWilsn SamWilsn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just needs an author approval

@xinbenlv
Copy link
Contributor

xinbenlv commented Jun 5, 2024

For this kind of fix, can we just lower the requirement to just 2 editor-s approval? or even one should be ok

Copy link

There has been no activity on this pull request for 2 weeks. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. If you would like to move this PR forward, please respond to any outstanding feedback or add a comment indicating that you have addressed all required feedback and are ready for a review.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-stale Waiting on activity label Jun 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-update Modifies an existing proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus s-final This EIP is Final t-core w-ci Waiting on CI to pass w-stale Waiting on activity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants