Convert transaction descriptions from English to python code #708
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Only a change of presentation, does not make any substantive changes. Does NOT handle Deposit transactions because that is a special case for which I recommend a deeper change (will do this in another PR soon).
Co-Authored-By: vbuterin <v@buterin.com>
Co-Authored-By: vbuterin <v@buterin.com>
Co-Authored-By: vbuterin <v@buterin.com>
|
Agreed with Danny, this is fantastic. Doing something similar for "Per-epoch processing" would be fab. |
hwwhww
reviewed
Mar 1, 2019
Co-Authored-By: vbuterin <v@buterin.com>
Co-Authored-By: vbuterin <v@buterin.com>
Co-Authored-By: vbuterin <v@buterin.com>
djrtwo
approved these changes
Mar 2, 2019
9 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Only a change of presentation, does not make any substantive changes.
Does NOT handle Deposit transactions because that is a special case for which I recommend a deeper change (will do this in another PR soon).