common,util,tx,block,client: implement EIP-6493 stable container txs

[g11tech]

WIP

ref: - https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-6493.md

How to :

git clone the repo and checkout/pull the eip-6493 branch

in repo root run: npm i this will build all packages:

test ssz spec for the ssz wrappers

1. cd packages/util
2. (build the package if changed something from last build); npm run build
3. run test spec: npx vitest run test/ssz.spec.ts

TODO:

• profile and stable container serialize differently get the ssz lib working properly
  right now the ssz lib is not working properly cc @wemeetagain
  Problem: profile serialized ssz bytes don't seem deserializable by the stable container
  check failing spec above (https://github.com/ethereumjs/ethereumjs-monorepo/pull/3452/files#diff-5d50fba613345073a01d3ebcf69348dc39474f6ee77eb863168d60599a3e7038R31)
• ssz receipts
• serialized tx prefix?
• poolex txs wrapper and accept ssz pooled txs
• the "native" ssz 0x04/0x05 transaction (need to update the prefix as 7702 is 0x04 thanks @jochem-brouwer for pointing this out :) )
• engine api ssz transaction payload
• transaction inclusion proof to getTransactionX

Note

1. please note that a dummy hardfork eip6493 has been added for ease of development testing and devnet creation (on top of prague) so that will be cleaned up later when the work will become mergable
2. some parts of the code will be cleaned up/optimized for e.g. right now PR removes the root calc optimization of empty transactions/withdrawals (for trie). however this will be added back along with the default values for ssz as well

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 83.88%. Comparing base (d24ca11) to head (15c4677).
Report is 34 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 15c4677 differs from pull request most recent head 5a064ce

Please upload reports for the commit 5a064ce to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
block	80.78% <ø> (?)
blockchain	90.97% <ø> (ø)
common	?
evm	73.75% <ø> (?)
genesis	99.98% <ø> (?)
statemanager	?
util	?
vm	63.04% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[paulmillr]

FYI micro-eth-signer (https://github.com/paulmillr/micro-eth-signer) ssz implementation was like 8 times smaller the last time i've checked.

It's tree-shakeable, so you won't need to use the entire package.

[holgerd77]

🤔

Atm this work here is conceptual only (so: not to be merged soon), but might be worth a try.

[wemeetagain]

@paulmillr nice library, if you implement https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/EIPS/eip-7495.md there, then it can be used

[etan-status]

@paulmillr thanks, have added it to https://stabilitynow.box