Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Airstrike and artillery support possible in impossible location #817

Closed
ETLegacyTeam opened this issue Mar 5, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
🐞 Bug Something isn't working cat: general Category engine (client/server) P4: Low Priority 4
Milestone

Comments

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member

Author: @rmarquis (Spyhawk)
Date: 2015-02-20
Redmine Issue: 817, https://dev.etlegacy.com/issues/817


It's possible to call airstrike and artillery support in location that should be available (ie, the lower caves passage in oasis).

Instead of having the "Can't see target" message, the airstrike/artillery support occurs.

@ETLegacyTeam ETLegacyTeam added 🐞 Bug Something isn't working cat: general Category engine (client/server) P4: Low Priority 4 labels Mar 5, 2020
@ETLegacyTeam ETLegacyTeam added this to the Future milestone Mar 5, 2020
@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: @rmarquis (Spyhawk)
Date: 2015-02-20T13:27:33Z


This seems to be a map bug on oasis. This issue happens only if you aim close to the wall behind the broken door on the lower excavation level. If you aim a short distance after the door, the attack support doesn't occur.

@ETLegacyTeam
Copy link
Member Author

From: Mateos (Mateos)
Date: 2015-02-22T18:48:42Z


Since the location calculation is done base on the trace map which is low resolution, it isn't unexpected to have this kind of problem ^^'

Mappers usually test and manually modify the trace map to ensure this kind of stuff doesn't happen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🐞 Bug Something isn't working cat: general Category engine (client/server) P4: Low Priority 4
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants