This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 4, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 532
Assembly instruction invalid()
was not behaving correctly
#274
Comments
invalid()
was not behaving correctlyinvalid()
was not behaving correctly
Confirmed PR #272 will fix this issue. The PR will consider all VM error as failure and produce a failed tx receipt. |
11 tasks
yihuang
referenced
this issue
in yihuang/ethermint
Jul 13, 2021
fedekunze
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 15, 2021
mmsqe
added a commit
to mmsqe/ethermint
that referenced
this issue
Jun 14, 2023
…kport: evmos#1773) (evmos#274) * fix: avoid channel get changed when concurrent subscribe happens (backport: evmos#1773) (#247) * fix leveldb for more info, syndtr/goleveldb@afa5311 * avoid channel get changed when concurrent subscribe happens * add test * add change doc * update tm-db * fix err msg due to empty version check fix for more info, see https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/pull/13355/files * fix test
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
System info: [Include Ethermint commit, operating system name, and other relevant details]
Steps to reproduce:
tests/solidity
andyarn install
yarn test --network ethermint opcode
yarn test --network ganache opcode
Expected behavior: [What you expected to happen]
Expect tests all passed
Actual behavior: [What actually happened]
Additional info: [Include gist of relevant config, logs, etc.]
The test code here:
According to the Solidity assembly: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/v0.5.3/assembly.html#opcodes
This instruction
invalid()
should end the execution and throw an exception.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: