Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

📚 DOCS: Fix myst-docutils README #462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2021
Merged

📚 DOCS: Fix myst-docutils README #462

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2021

Conversation

jpmckinney
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 15, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #462 (1342be3) into master (5d1b081) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #462   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.28%   90.28%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines        1986     1986           
=======================================
  Hits         1793     1793           
  Misses        193      193           
Flag Coverage Δ
pytests 90.28% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5d1b081...1342be3. Read the comment docs.

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell changed the title docs: Fix "myst-docutils is identical to myst-docutils" typo 📚 DOCS: Fix myst-docutils README Dec 16, 2021
Copy link
Member

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cheers

@chrisjsewell chrisjsewell merged commit d84e625 into executablebooks:master Dec 16, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants