E2020. Let course staff as well as students do reviews

[epeden]

No description provided.

[expertiza-bot]

1 Message

💬

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! 🎉 The Expertiza team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from us soon. This repository is being automatically checked for code-quality issues using Code Climate. You can see results for this analysis in the PR status below. Newly introduced issues should be fixed before a pull request is considered ready to review. Also, please spend some time looking at the instructions at the top of your course project writeup. If you have any questions, please send email to expertiza-support@lists.ncsu.edu.

	1 Warning
⚠️	In your tests, there are many expectations of elements on pages, which is good. To avoid shallow tests – tests concentrating on irrelevant, unlikely-to-fail conditions – please write more expectations to validate other things, such as database records, dynamically generated contents.
✅	There are code changes, but no corresponding tests. Please include tests if this PR introduces any modifications in behavior.

Generated by expertiza-bot

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-2.3%) to 28.178% when pulling 56cb28e on epeden:beta into caf4c6c on expertiza:beta.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+11.01%) to 41.493% when pulling c684bc7 on epeden:beta into caf4c6c on expertiza:beta.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-2.3%) to 28.178% when pulling 56cb28e on epeden:beta into caf4c6c on expertiza:beta.

[expertiza-travisci-bot]

Hey @epeden,
Your changes look good to me! 🎉

[Winbobob]

/rerun