Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Citation information #272

Closed
interrogator opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Citation information #272

interrogator opened this issue Feb 22, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@interrogator
Copy link

If we want to reference spaCy in a paper (and we do), there should be clear citation available, preferably with a DOI. Zenodo can create a DOI for a repository if there is no preferred paper. Thanks!

@honnibal
Copy link
Member

Hey,

Personally in my own papers I like to cite algorithms and footnote implementations.

The parser can be cited as Honnibal and Johnson (2015): http://www.emnlp2015.org/proceedings/EMNLP/bib/EMNLP162.bib . For the tagging algorithm I'd say that it's an averaged perceptron tagger following Collins (2002?), but with Brown cluster features as described by Koo and Collins (2008), and using greedy decoding. The named entity tagger is a bit harder to cite, because I haven't really documented the algorithm anywhere.

For the implementation I would specify the version and give the website. There are GitHub tags associated with each version, so you might prefer that. If you want to cite, you can use a DOI number --- that sounds fine.

I'd like to put a demo paper into this year's ACL. That would be one way to resolve this.

@interrogator
Copy link
Author

That's enough to go on for now. Thanks!

@lock
Copy link

lock bot commented May 9, 2018

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 9, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants