Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Faabric update: MPI queue-less local messages, reworked async #434

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 17, 2021

Conversation

csegarragonz
Copy link
Collaborator

@csegarragonz csegarragonz commented Jun 15, 2021

Bumping the faabric dependency to include (among others) the major changes introduced to the MPI port in faasm/faabric#105 and faasm/faabric#111.

I have also had to merge in the per-host flushing and dirty page integration from #435 together with a fix for a possible race condition in faasm/faabric#115.

@csegarragonz csegarragonz self-assigned this Jun 15, 2021
@Shillaker Shillaker self-requested a review June 15, 2021 14:11
@Shillaker
Copy link
Collaborator

Would be good to merge this to see if it fixes the MPI test issues I keep seeing.

@csegarragonz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Indeed, as tests have passed first try for me.

@Shillaker Shillaker changed the title Bump faabric Faabric update: MPI queue-less local messages, reworked async Jun 15, 2021
@Shillaker
Copy link
Collaborator

Note that this may be required to compile against latest Faabric master: #435 .

@csegarragonz csegarragonz force-pushed the bump-faabric branch 2 times, most recently from 822e06c to e058dfe Compare June 16, 2021 12:17
@csegarragonz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csegarragonz commented Jun 17, 2021

@Shillaker re-requested a review, as things have changed a bit since you last approved.

@csegarragonz csegarragonz merged commit fc720b3 into master Jun 17, 2021
@csegarragonz csegarragonz deleted the bump-faabric branch June 17, 2021 08:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants